Peskin v. City of New York
This text of 297 A.D.2d 316 (Peskin v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[317]*317Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court correctly denied that branch of its motion which was to set aside the verdict pursuant to CPLR 4404 (a). The jury could have reached its determination on a fair interpretation of the evidence presented with consideration given to the credibility of the witnesses and the drawing of reasonable inferences therefrom (see Cohen v Hallmark Cards, 45 NY2d 493; Pomaro v McKeon, 228 AD2d 572; Nicastro v Park, 113 AD2d 129).
The amount of damages awarded by the jury deviated materially from what would be reasonable compensation to the extent indicated herein (see CPLR 5501 [c]; Zavurov v City of New York, 241 AD2d 491). S. Miller, J.P., Schmidt, Adams and Townes, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
297 A.D.2d 316, 746 N.Y.2d 267, 746 N.Y.S.2d 267, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7924, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peskin-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-2002.