Pesci v. Goodrich

2012 Ohio 4540, 977 N.E.2d 628, 133 Ohio St. 3d 227
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided October 3, 2012·No. 2012-0987·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} We dismiss the appeal of appellant, James Pesci, from the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus because he failed to file a timely notice of appeal from the judgment. S.CtPrac.R. 2.2(A)(1)(a) (“To perfect an appeal from a court of appeals to the Supreme Court, * * * the appellant shall file a notice of appeal in the Supreme Court within forty-five days from the entry of the judgment being appealed”). Pesci’s Civ.R. 60(B) motion for relief from judgment did not extend his time to appeal the judgment, and Pesci could not use Civ.R. 60(B) as a substitute for a timely appeal. State ex rel. Manuel v. Stenson, 126 Ohio St.3d 52, 2010-Ohio-2673, 930 N.E.2d 310, citing State ex rel. Martin v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth., 124 Ohio St.3d 63, 2009-Ohio-6164, 918 N.E.2d 1005.

Appeal dismissed.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pesci v. Goodrich, 2012 Ohio 4540, 977 N.E.2d 628, 133 Ohio St. 3d 227 (Ohio 2012).

2012 Ohio 4540 (Pesci v. Goodrich) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Manuel v. Stenson
2010 Ohio 2673 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2010)
State Ex Rel. Martin v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority
2009 Ohio 6164 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2009)