Pescetti v. Mastrodominico
This text of 425 N.E.2d 893 (Pescetti v. Mastrodominico) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On summary consideration, order affirmed, with costs. The determination of the Appellate Division reversing the Trial Term’s order for a new trial and reinstating the jury verdict, although appealable, is not subject to our review (Noia v De Rosa, 54 NY2d 631, decided herewith; Donigi v American Cyanamid Co., 43 NY2d 935; Pfohl v Wipperman, 34 NY2d 597).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
425 N.E.2d 893, 54 N.Y.2d 633, 442 N.Y.S.2d 505, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2598, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pescetti-v-mastrodominico-ny-1981.