Pesce v. Reuter

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pesce v. Reuter

262 A.D.2d 648, 691 N.Y.S.2d 895, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7641

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 28, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 262 A.D.2d 648 (Pesce v. Reuter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pesce v. Reuter, 262 A.D.2d 648, 691 N.Y.S.2d 895, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7641 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to compel the respondents to reappoint the petitioner to the position of Bus Operator, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jones, J.), dated July 24, 1998, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court correctly denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding, as a rational basis existed for the respondents’ refusal to reappoint the petitioner to the position of Bus Operator (see, Matter of Hedeman v County of Dutchess, 234 AD2d 294; Matter of Dramis v Nassau County Community Coll., 173 AD2d 705; Matter of Schmitt v Kiley, 124 AD2d 661). Bracken, J. P., Thompson, Goldstein, McGinity and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to compel the respondents to reappoint the petitioner to the position of Bus Operator, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jones, J.), dated July 24, 1998, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court correctly denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding, as a rational basis existed for the respondents’ refusal to reappoint the petitioner to the position of Bus Operator (see, Matter of Hedeman v County of Dutchess, 234 AD2d 294; Matter of Dramis v Nassau County Community Coll., 173 AD2d 705; Matter of Schmitt v Kiley, 124 AD2d 661). Bracken, J. P., Thompson, Goldstein, McGinity and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

262 A.D.2d 648, 691 N.Y.S.2d 895, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7641, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pesce-v-reuter-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack