Pescado Loco, L.L.C. v. Chesterfield Center Corp.

229 S.W.3d 125, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 653, 2007 WL 1191627
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 24, 2007·No. ED 88657·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Pescado Loco, L.L.C. (“Tenant”) appeals from the order and judgment of the trial *126 court granting Chesterfield Center Corporation’s (“Landlord”) motion for summary judgment, and finding that the lease between Landlord and Tenant had been validly terminated, and ordering Tenant to vacate the leased premises in St. Louis County, Missouri. Tenant also appeals the denial of its motion for summary judgment.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pescado Loco, L.L.C. v. Chesterfield Center Corp., 229 S.W.3d 125, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 653, 2007 WL 1191627 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

229 S.W.3d 125 (Pescado Loco, L.L.C. v. Chesterfield Center Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Jackson
229 S.W.3d 125 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)