Pescado Loco, L.L.C. v. Chesterfield Center Corp.

229 S.W.3d 125, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 653, 2007 WL 1191627
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 24, 2007
DocketED 88657
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 229 S.W.3d 125 (Pescado Loco, L.L.C. v. Chesterfield Center Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pescado Loco, L.L.C. v. Chesterfield Center Corp., 229 S.W.3d 125, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 653, 2007 WL 1191627 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Pescado Loco, L.L.C. (“Tenant”) appeals from the order and judgment of the trial *126 court granting Chesterfield Center Corporation’s (“Landlord”) motion for summary judgment, and finding that the lease between Landlord and Tenant had been validly terminated, and ordering Tenant to vacate the leased premises in St. Louis County, Missouri. Tenant also appeals the denial of its motion for summary judgment.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Jackson
229 S.W.3d 125 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
229 S.W.3d 125, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 653, 2007 WL 1191627, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pescado-loco-llc-v-chesterfield-center-corp-moctapp-2007.