Pesaty v. Warmbrand Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pesaty v. Warmbrand Realty Corp.

240 A.D. 1009

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1933·Published

Opinion

Order denying motion to cancel lis pendens affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, without prejudice to a renewal by the appellants upon a showing that the respondent’s lien was not admitted in the complaint, or if admitted, that it was contested by another defendant, as set forth in section 44, subdivision 3, of the Lien Law. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying motion to cancel lis pendens affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, without prejudice to a renewal by the appellants upon a showing that the respondent’s lien was not admitted in the complaint, or if admitted, that it was contested by another defendant, as set forth in section 44, subdivision 3, of the Lien Law. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.

Pesaty v. Warmbrand Realty Corp., 240 A.D. 1009 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

240 A.D. 1009 (Pesaty v. Warmbrand Realty Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.