Peruna Acquisition, LLC. a Nevada Limited Liability Co. v. Arkansas Sod & Turf Farms, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Peruna Acquisition, LLC. a Nevada Limited Liability Co. v. Arkansas Sod & Turf Farms, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 19, 2016·No. 02-16-00048-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-16-00048-CV

PERUNA ACQUISITION, LLC. A APPELLANT NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY CO.

V.

ARKANSAS SOD & TURF FARMS, APPELLEE INC.

------------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TARRANT COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. 2014-005410-2

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------

We have considered the parties’ “Joint Motion To Modify Judgment And Affirm.” The motion requests in the alternative for this court to vacate the trial court’s judgment and remand this case to the trial court for entry of judgment consistent with the terms of the parties’ settlement. Because the record

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

demonstrates that a defendant who was involved in the underlying proceedings is not a party to this appeal, we grant the parties’ joint motion in part as to the alternative relief requested. Accordingly, we set aside the trial court’s judgment without regard to the merits and remand the case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties’ agreement. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: WALKER, MEIER, and GABRIEL, JJ. DELIVERED: May 19, 2016

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-16-00048-CV

PERUNA ACQUISITION, LLC. A APPELLANT NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY CO.

V.

ARKANSAS SOD & TURF FARMS, APPELLEE INC.

------------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TARRANT COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. 2014-005410-2

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------

We have considered the parties’ “Joint Motion To Modify Judgment And Affirm.” The motion requests in the alternative for this court to vacate the trial court’s judgment and remand this case to the trial court for entry of judgment consistent with the terms of the parties’ settlement. Because the record

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

demonstrates that a defendant who was involved in the underlying proceedings is not a party to this appeal, we grant the parties’ joint motion in part as to the alternative relief requested. Accordingly, we set aside the trial court’s judgment without regard to the merits and remand the case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties’ agreement. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: WALKER, MEIER, and GABRIEL, JJ. DELIVERED: May 19, 2016

Peruna Acquisition, LLC. a Nevada Limited Liability Co. v. Arkansas Sod & Turf Farms, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Peruna Acquisition, LLC. a Nevada Limited Liability Co. v. Arkansas Sod & Turf Farms, Inc. (Peruna Acquisition, LLC. a Nevada Limited Liability Co. v. Arkansas Sod & Turf Farms, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.