Pertillio v. State

111 So. 759, 22 Ala. App. 29, 1927 Ala. App. LEXIS 12
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 22, 1927
Docket6 Div. 65.
StatusPublished

This text of 111 So. 759 (Pertillio v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pertillio v. State, 111 So. 759, 22 Ala. App. 29, 1927 Ala. App. LEXIS 12 (Ala. Ct. App. 1927).

Opinion

SAMPORD, J.

The defendant was convicted of larceny of an automobile, the property of the Bessemer Transfer & Storage Company. The facts tended to prove that defendant rented the automobile from the storage company to be used and returned before 9 o’clock of the day on which it was rented. The automobile was not returned, and, search being made for it, it was found in the possession of defendant, with the hub-meter, two tires, and the license tag removed.

The facts justified a submission of the case to the jury. Fox v. State, 17 Ala. App. 559, 87 So. 621.

Predicate was laid for the admission of statements by the defendant in the nature of confessions. The question of whether the corpus delicti had been proven was for the jury under the evidence. This being the case, the confessions and admissions were properly admitted.

We find no reversible error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fox v. State
87 So. 621 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
111 So. 759, 22 Ala. App. 29, 1927 Ala. App. LEXIS 12, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pertillio-v-state-alactapp-1927.