Pert v. State
148 So. 879, 25 Ala. App. 480, 1933 Ala. App. LEXIS 132
This text of 148 So. 879 (Pert v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Pert v. State, 148 So. 879, 25 Ala. App. 480, 1933 Ala. App. LEXIS 132 (Ala. Ct. App. 1933).
Opinion
Defendant appeals from a conviction on a charge of manufacturing whisky. There is no bill of exceptions, in the absence of which we do not review the trial court in its rulings and on charges based upon the evidence. There being no error in the record, the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
148 So. 879, 25 Ala. App. 480, 1933 Ala. App. LEXIS 132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pert-v-state-alactapp-1933.