Personius v. Mann

New York Court of Appeals

Personius v. Mann

840 N.E.2d 1024, 5 N.Y.3d 857, 807 N.Y.S.2d 11, 2005 N.Y. LEXIS 3212

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 17, 2005

StatusPublished

Cited by11 cases

This text of 840 N.E.2d 1024 (Personius v. Mann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Personius v. Mann, 840 N.E.2d 1024, 5 N.Y.3d 857, 807 N.Y.S.2d 11, 2005 N.Y. LEXIS 3212 (N.Y. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order modified, with costs to plaintiffs, by denying defendants’ motion for summary judgment as to the negligence cause of action and, as so modified, affirmed. A question of fact existed as to whether defendants fulfilled their duty to inspect and maintain the pole in question.

Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges G.B. Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo, Read and R.S. Smith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order modified, with costs to plaintiffs, by denying defendants’ motion for summary judgment as to the negligence cause of action and, as so modified, affirmed. A question of fact existed as to whether defendants fulfilled their duty to inspect and maintain the pole in question.

Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges G.B. Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo, Read and R.S. Smith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

840 N.E.2d 1024, 5 N.Y.3d 857, 807 N.Y.S.2d 11, 2005 N.Y. LEXIS 3212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/personius-v-mann-ny-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack