Personalized Home Care, Ltd. v. Tvert
This text of 262 A.D.2d 383 (Personalized Home Care, Ltd. v. Tvert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for accounting malpractice, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Coppola, J.), entered June 3, 1998, which granted the defendants’ motion pursuant to CPLR 3126 to dismiss the complaint for failure to provide discovery.
Ordered that the order is reversed, as a matter of discretion, with costs, the motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated; and it is further,
Ordered that the plaintiffs’ time to produce the appropriate witnesses for deposition is enlarged until 30 days after the service upon them of a copy of this decision and order.
The Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in dismissing the plaintiffs’ complaint pursuant to CPLR 3126 inasmuch as the plaintiffs did not exhibit willful and contumacious conduct in failing to appear for depositions (see, Zletz v Wetanson, 67 NY2d 711, 713). However, the plaintiffs are directed to produce the appropriate witnesses for deposition. Friedmann, J. P., Krausman, McGinity and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
262 A.D.2d 383, 691 N.Y.S.2d 571, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6349, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/personalized-home-care-ltd-v-tvert-nyappdiv-1999.