Personal Restraint Petition Of Muhammed Tillisy

• Court: Court of Appeals of Washington
• Decided: July 19, 2021
• Docket: 81329-3
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

In the Matter of the Personal Restraint of: DIVISION ONE

MUHAMMED TILLISY, No. 81329-3-I

Petitioner. UNPUBLISHED OPINION

DWYER, J. — Petitioner Muhammed Tillisy, an inmate at Monroe

Correctional Complex, filed a personal restraint petition claiming that his

conditions of confinement violate article I, section 14 of the Washington

Constitution and the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution. This

is so, he asserts, because of the risk of harm he faces from exposure to COVID-

19. Because Tillisy has since been vaccinated against COVID-19, the risk of

harm that Tillisy faces from COVID-19 has been virtually eliminated.

Accordingly, we deny his petition as moot.

I

Muhammed Tillisy is serving a 49 month sentence for identify theft,

forgery, and unlawful production of a payment instrument. Tillisy suffers from

intracranial hypertension, which has required significant medical attention and No. 81329-3-I/2

has caused him to go blind in one eye. Tillisy also has high blood pressure.

Tillisy’s body mass index is higher than 30, which places him at increased risk for

serious illness from COVID-19. See Underlying Medical Conditions Associated

with High Risk Severe COVID-19: Information for Healthcare Providers, CTRS.

FOR DISEASE CONTROL & PREVENTION (May 13, 2021),

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/clinical-

care/underlyingconditions.html [https://perma.cc/TA4N-4GWB].

On April 2, 2020, shortly after the COVID-19 pandemic began, while Tillisy

was being held at the Stafford Creek Corrections Center, he filed an “Emergency

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus” in the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court

designated the petition as a personal restraint petition, and transferred it to this

court pursuant to RAP 16.5. In December 2020, our acting chief judge referred

the petition to a panel for a determination of its merits, reasoning that Tillisy’s

claims regarding the Department of Corrections’ management of Tillisy’s medical

conditions and risk of COVID-19 exposure were not frivolous. In the same order,

counsel was appointed to represent Tillisy.

Since Tillisy’s initial petition, he has been moved to the Monroe

Correctional Complex. He received a first dose of the Moderna vaccine on April

20, 2021, and a second dose on June 18, 2021.

II

Tillisy challenges only the conditions of his confinement, contending that,

given his personal medical history, the risk of harm that he faces from exposure

2 No. 81329-3-I/3

to COVID-19 while incarcerated violates article I, section 14 of the Washington

Constitution and the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

Tillisy’s circumstances have changed substantially in the time since his

petition was initially filed. Most significantly, he has been vaccinated against

COVID-19, reducing his risk of contracting COVID-19 by 94.1 percent.1 Indeed,

had the staff at Monroe Correctional Complex not offered vaccination to Tillisy,

that would have been the most likely remedy to which he would have been

entitled. But he has been vaccinated.

Accordingly, Tillisy’s petition is now moot. We will not consider a moot

issue, unless it concerns a matter of continuing and substantial public interest. In

re Pers. Restraint of Silas, 135 Wn. App. 564, 568, 145 P.3d 1219 (2006). The

only such issue here, whether article I, section 14 of our state constitution

provides broader protection than the Eighth Amendment, has recently been

determined by our Supreme Court and is therefore no longer in need of

resolution. Order, No. 99344-1, In re Pers. Restraint Petition of Robert Rufus

Williams, (Wash. Mar. 12. 2021) (declaring that article I, section 14 of the

Washington State Constitution provides more protection than the Eighth

Amendment to the United States Constitution).2

Tillisy has been vaccinated—a state of the art response to the dangers of

COVID-19. The primary legal issue raised in his petition has been decided by

our Supreme Court. We deny his petition as moot.

1Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine Overview and Safety, CTRS. FOR DISEASE CONTROL &

PREVENTION (June 11, 2021), https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/different- vaccines/Moderna.html [https://perma.cc/36HE-ADFE]. 2 An opinion explaining the Supreme Court’s reasoning is forthcoming.

3 No. 81329-3-I/4

WE CONCUR: