Personal Restraint Petition Of Kamara Kam Chouap

CourtCourt of Appeals of Washington
DecidedJune 5, 2018
Docket51278-5
StatusUnpublished

This text of Personal Restraint Petition Of Kamara Kam Chouap (Personal Restraint Petition Of Kamara Kam Chouap) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Personal Restraint Petition Of Kamara Kam Chouap, (Wash. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

Filed Washington State Court of Appeals Division Two

June 5, 2018

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

DIVISION II In the Matter of the No. 51278-5-II Personal Restraint of

KAMARA KAM CHOUAP,

Petitioner. UNPUBLISHED OPINION

MELNICK, J. — Kamara Chouap seeks relief from personal restraint resulting from his

2010 conviction for assault in the second degree.1 The trial court sentenced him to 120 months of

confinement and 18 months of community custody. That sentence exceeds the statutory maximum

sentence of 120 months. RCW 9A.20.021(1)(b).

Chouap argues that he is entitled to have his term of confinement reduced to 102 months

so he can be allowed to serve his 18-month term of community custody.2 The State concedes that

Chouap’s sentence exceeds the statutory maximum sentence, but that under In re Personal

Restraint of McWilliams, 182 Wn.2d 213, 218, 340 P.3d 223 (2014), Chouap is entitled only to the

1 He does not seek relief from his convictions for two counts of attempting to evade a pursuing police vehicle. 2 Because Chouap’s judgment and sentence is facially invalid, his petition, which was transferred to us by the trial court under CrR 7.8(b), is not time-barred by RCW 10.73.090(1). No. 51278-5-II

addition to his judgment and sentence of a Brooks3 notation that under no circumstances shall the

combined terms of confinement and of community custody exceed the statutory maximum

sentence.

We agree with the State and remand Chouap’s judgment and sentence for addition of a

Brooks notation that under no circumstances shall the combined terms of confinement and of

community custody exceed the statutory maximum sentence.4

A majority of the panel having determined that this opinion will not be printed in the

Washington Appellate Reports, but will be filed for public record in accordance with RCW 2.06.040,

it is so ordered.

MELNICK, J. We concur:

JOHANSON, P.J.

SUTTON, J.

3 In re Personal Restraint of Brooks, 166 Wn.2d 664, 675, 211 P.3d 1023 (2009). 4 Because Chouap was sentenced before the legislature overruled Brooks by enacting RCW 9.94A.701(9), Brooks is applicable to him. See McWilliams, 182 Wn.2d at 218. 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Brooks
211 P.3d 1023 (Washington Supreme Court, 2009)
In re the Personal Restraint of Brooks
166 Wash. 2d 664 (Washington Supreme Court, 2009)
In re the Personal Restraint of McWilliams
340 P.3d 223 (Washington Supreme Court, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Personal Restraint Petition Of Kamara Kam Chouap, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/personal-restraint-petition-of-kamara-kam-chouap-washctapp-2018.