Personal Restraint Petition Of Delane Michael Dufloth, Pettioner

Court of Appeals of Washington·Decided February 1, 2022·No. 55851-3·Unpublished

Opinion

Filed

Washington State

Court of Appeals

Division Two

February 1, 2022

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION II

In the Matter of the Personal Restraint of:

No. 55851-3-II

DELANE MICHAEL DUFLOTH, UNPUBLISHED OPINION

Petitioner.

LEE, C.J. — Delane M. Dufloth seeks relief from personal restraint imposed following his 2021 pleas of guilty to bail jumping under two Kitsap County cause numbers, 18-1-01260-18 and 18-1-01867-18.1 He argues that because the two bail jumping convictions arise out of the same failure to appear, they violate double jeopardy.

The State concedes that under State v. O’Brien, 164 Wn. App. 924, 928-29, 267 P.3d 422 (2011), multiple convictions for bail jumping under different cause numbers arising out of the same failure to appear violate double jeopardy.

We accept the State’s concession. Accordingly, we grant Dufloth’s petition, reverse the bail jumping conviction in cause number 18-1-01867-18, and remand to the trial court to vacate the conviction for and dismiss with prejudice the charge of bail jumping in cause number 18-1- 01867-18.

1 Dufloth pleaded guilty to other charges in both cause numbers, but they are not at issue here.

No. 55851-3-II

A majority of the panel having determined that this opinion will not be printed in the Washington Appellate Reports, but will be filed for public record in accordance with RCW 2.06.040, it is so ordered.

Lee, C.J.

We concur:

Worswick, J.

Glasgow, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Personal Restraint Petition Of Delane Michael Dufloth, Pettioner, (Wash. Ct. App. 2022).

Personal Restraint Petition Of Delane Michael Dufloth, Pettioner (Personal Restraint Petition Of Delane Michael Dufloth, Pettioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. O'Brien
267 P.3d 422 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2011)