Personal Restraint Petition Of Brandon Casey Pries

CourtCourt of Appeals of Washington
DecidedFebruary 13, 2019
Docket51810-4
StatusUnpublished

This text of Personal Restraint Petition Of Brandon Casey Pries (Personal Restraint Petition Of Brandon Casey Pries) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Personal Restraint Petition Of Brandon Casey Pries, (Wash. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

Filed Washington State Court of Appeals Division Two

February 13, 2019

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

DIVISION II In the Matter of No. 51810-4-II the Personal Restraint of

BRANDON C. PRIES,

Petitioner. UNPUBLISHED OPINION

LEE, A.C.J. — Brandon C. Pries seeks relief from personal restraint resulting from his

2011 plea of guilty to failure to register as a sex offender - second offense under former RCW

9A.44.132(1)(b) (2010). He argues that because his prior convictions for failure to register as a

sex offender were under former RCW 9A.44.130 (2010), not under former RCW 9A.44.132, the

trial court erred in sentencing him to a class B felony under former RCW 9A.44.132(1)(b) and

instead should have sentenced him to a class C felony under former RCW 9A.44.132(1)(a)(ii).1

State v. Wilcox, 196 Wn. App. 206, 210-11, 383 P.3d 549 (2016). The State concedes that Pries

is correct and that he is entitled to be resentenced. We accept the State’s concession.

Because Pries’s prior convictions for failure to register as a sex offender were under former

RCW 9A.44.130 and not under former RCW 9A.44.132, Pries’s prior convictions do not fall under

the definition of a sex offense. Wilcox, 196 Wn. App. at 210-13. Thus, the trial court improperly

1 Because the State concedes that Pries’s judgment and sentence is facially invalid, it is not subject to RCW 10.73.090’s time bar. No. 51810-4-II

sentenced Pries to a class B felony and improperly imposed a registration requirement. Therefore,

we grant Pries’s petition, reverse his sentence, and remand for resentencing. We deny his request

for appointment of counsel.

A majority of the panel having determined that this opinion will not be printed in the

Washington Appellate Reports, but will be filed for public record in accordance with RCW 2.06.040,

it is so ordered.

LEE, A.C.J. We concur:

WORSWICK, J.

SUTTON, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Of Washington, V Franklin Hershel Wilcox
383 P.3d 549 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Personal Restraint Petition Of Brandon Casey Pries, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/personal-restraint-petition-of-brandon-casey-pries-washctapp-2019.