Personal Restraint Petition Of Brandon Casey Pries
This text of Personal Restraint Petition Of Brandon Casey Pries (Personal Restraint Petition Of Brandon Casey Pries) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed Washington State Court of Appeals Division Two
February 13, 2019
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
DIVISION II In the Matter of No. 51810-4-II the Personal Restraint of
BRANDON C. PRIES,
Petitioner. UNPUBLISHED OPINION
LEE, A.C.J. — Brandon C. Pries seeks relief from personal restraint resulting from his
2011 plea of guilty to failure to register as a sex offender - second offense under former RCW
9A.44.132(1)(b) (2010). He argues that because his prior convictions for failure to register as a
sex offender were under former RCW 9A.44.130 (2010), not under former RCW 9A.44.132, the
trial court erred in sentencing him to a class B felony under former RCW 9A.44.132(1)(b) and
instead should have sentenced him to a class C felony under former RCW 9A.44.132(1)(a)(ii).1
State v. Wilcox, 196 Wn. App. 206, 210-11, 383 P.3d 549 (2016). The State concedes that Pries
is correct and that he is entitled to be resentenced. We accept the State’s concession.
Because Pries’s prior convictions for failure to register as a sex offender were under former
RCW 9A.44.130 and not under former RCW 9A.44.132, Pries’s prior convictions do not fall under
the definition of a sex offense. Wilcox, 196 Wn. App. at 210-13. Thus, the trial court improperly
1 Because the State concedes that Pries’s judgment and sentence is facially invalid, it is not subject to RCW 10.73.090’s time bar. No. 51810-4-II
sentenced Pries to a class B felony and improperly imposed a registration requirement. Therefore,
we grant Pries’s petition, reverse his sentence, and remand for resentencing. We deny his request
for appointment of counsel.
A majority of the panel having determined that this opinion will not be printed in the
Washington Appellate Reports, but will be filed for public record in accordance with RCW 2.06.040,
it is so ordered.
LEE, A.C.J. We concur:
WORSWICK, J.
SUTTON, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Personal Restraint Petition Of Brandon Casey Pries, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/personal-restraint-petition-of-brandon-casey-pries-washctapp-2019.