Personal Restraint Petition Of Boyd Keith Stacy

CourtCourt of Appeals of Washington
DecidedOctober 19, 2021
Docket56110-7
StatusUnpublished

This text of Personal Restraint Petition Of Boyd Keith Stacy (Personal Restraint Petition Of Boyd Keith Stacy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Personal Restraint Petition Of Boyd Keith Stacy, (Wash. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

Filed Washington State Court of Appeals Division Two

October 19, 2021 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

DIVISION II

In the Matter of the Personal Restraint of: No. 56110-7-II BOYD KEITH STACY, UNPUBLISHED OPINION Petitioner.

LEE, C.J. — Boyd K. Stacy seeks relief from personal restraint imposed following his 2019

plea of guilty to one count of unlawful possession of controlled substances and two counts of bail

jumping, committed while charged with unlawful possession of controlled substances. He argues

that under State v. Blake, 197 Wn.2d 170, 481 P.3d 521 (2021), which held former RCW

69.50.4013(1) (2017), the statute making possession of controlled substances illegal, to be

unconstitutional, he is entitled to have all three convictions vacated. The State concedes that under

Blake, Stacy is entitled to have his conviction for unlawful possession of controlled substances

vacated. But the invalidation of his conviction for unlawful possession of controlled substances

does not affect the validity of the bail jumping convictions. State v. Downing, 122 Wn. App. 185,

193, 93 P.2d 900 (2004).

Accordingly, we grant Stacy’s petition with regard to the unlawful possession of controlled

substances conviction, and remand Stacy’s judgment and sentence to the trial court for vacation of

his conviction for unlawful possession of controlled substances and for resentencing on the

remaining convictions. We deny the remainder of his petition and deny his request for appointment

of counsel. No. 56110-7-II

A majority of the panel having determined that this opinion will not be printed in the

Washington Appellate Reports, but will be filed for public record in accordance with RCW 2.06.040,

it is so ordered.

Lee, C.J. We concur:

Glasgow, J.

Price, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Blake
481 P.3d 521 (Washington Supreme Court, 2021)
State v. Downing
93 P.3d 900 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Personal Restraint Petition Of Boyd Keith Stacy, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/personal-restraint-petition-of-boyd-keith-stacy-washctapp-2021.