Personal Restraint Petition Of Aenoy Phasay

Court of Appeals of Washington·Decided May 14, 2018·No. 76082-3·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

IN THE MATTER OF THE No. 76082-3-1 PERSONAL RESTRAINT OF:

DIVISION ONE

AENOY PHASAY, UNPUBLISHED OPINION

Petitioner.

FILED: MAY 1 4 2018

PER CURIAM — Aenoy Phasay seeks relief from his convictions for second

degree intentional murder and second degree felony murder. He contends, and the State concedes, that the convictions violate double jeopardy and that the matter must be remanded with directions "to vacate the lesser offense." State v. Hughes, 166 Wn.2d 675,686 n.13, 212 P.3d 558(2009)(discussing factors for determining lesser offense). Although the trial court merged the two convictions for sentencing purposes and expressly sentenced Phasay for only one conviction, a conviction carries an onus that, in and of itself, constitutes punishment for purposes of double jeopardy analysis. State v. Womac, 160 Wn.2d 643, 656-61, 160 P.3d 40(2007); State v. Turner, 169 Wn.2d 448, 455, 238 P.3d 461 (2010). Accordingly, we accept the concession of error and remand for vacation of the lesser offense.

Remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

FOR THE COURT:

em-2c,T1

,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Personal Restraint Petition Of Aenoy Phasay, (Wash. Ct. App. 2018).

Personal Restraint Petition Of Aenoy Phasay (Personal Restraint Petition Of Aenoy Phasay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Turner
238 P.3d 461 (Washington Supreme Court, 2010)
State v. Womac
160 P.3d 40 (Washington Supreme Court, 2007)
State v. Womac
160 Wash. 2d 643 (Washington Supreme Court, 2007)
State v. Hughes
212 P.3d 558 (Washington Supreme Court, 2009)