Person v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Person v. United States

23 Cust. Ct. 207, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1055

United States Customs Court·Decided November 15, 1949·No. No. 53718; protest 144058-K (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial the collector’s amended letter of transmittal of the protest was admitted in evidence advising that a new description of the merchandise, based on a corrected consular invoice and appraiser’s report, indicated that the merchandise should have been assessed for duty as claimed. In view of the evidence before the court, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial the collector’s amended letter of transmittal of the protest was admitted in evidence advising that a new description of the merchandise, based on a corrected consular invoice and appraiser’s report, indicated that the merchandise should have been assessed for duty as claimed. In view of the evidence before the court, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Person v. United States, 23 Cust. Ct. 207, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1055 (cusc 1949).

Pincite

23 Cust. Ct. 207 (Person v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.