Person v. United States
This text of 23 Cust. Ct. 207 (Person v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
At the trial the collector’s amended letter of transmittal of the protest was admitted in evidence advising that a new description of the merchandise, based on a corrected consular invoice and appraiser’s report, indicated that the merchandise should have been assessed for duty as claimed. In view of the evidence before the court, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
23 Cust. Ct. 207, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1055, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/person-v-united-states-cusc-1949.