Person v. Carolia Pines Regional

CourtCourt of Appeals of South Carolina
DecidedNovember 4, 2010
Docket2010-UP-484
StatusUnpublished

This text of Person v. Carolia Pines Regional (Person v. Carolia Pines Regional) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Person v. Carolia Pines Regional, (S.C. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

Ruth J. Person, Appellant,

v.

Carolina Pines Regional Medical Center, Respondent.


Appeal From Darlington County
J. Michael Baxley, Circuit Court Judge


Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-484
Submitted October 1, 2010 – Filed November 4, 2010   


APPEAL DISMISSED


Daryl James Corbin, of Florence, for Appellant.

Martin S. Driggers, Jr, of Hartsville, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Appellant Ruth J. Person appeals the trial court's denial of her motion for a new trial pursuant to Rule 59(b), SCRCP, following a jury verdict for Respondent Carolina Pines Regional Medical Center.  After the jury verdict, Person's counsel indicated, upon inquiry by the trial court, that Person had no post-trial motions.  The next day, Person requested ten days to file a new trial motion.  Because Person's request for ten days to file the motion was not timely, we dismiss[1] the appeal pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities:  Rule 59(b), SCRCP ("The motion for a new trial shall be made promptly after the jury is discharged, or in the discretion of the court not later than 10 days thereafter."); Boone v. Goodwin, 314 S.C. 374, 376, 444 S.E.2d 524, 525 (1994) ("[A] party must make a motion for a new trial promptly after the jury is discharged or request ten days within which to make the motion."). 

APPEAL DISMISSED.

WILLIAMS, PIEPER, and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.


[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Boone v. Goodwin
444 S.E.2d 524 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Person v. Carolia Pines Regional, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/person-v-carolia-pines-regional-scctapp-2010.