Persinger v. Washington
376 U.S. 187, 84 S. Ct. 638, 11 L. Ed. 2d 603, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 1784
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedFebruary 17, 1964
Docket745, Misc
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 376 U.S. 187 (Persinger v. Washington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Persinger v. Washington, 376 U.S. 187, 84 S. Ct. 638, 11 L. Ed. 2d 603, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 1784 (1964).
Opinion
PERSINGER
v.
WASHINGTON.
Supreme Court of United States.
Appellant pro se.
James E. Kennedy for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
People v. Gardenhire
903 P.2d 1159 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1995)
State v. Hoffman
412 A.2d 120 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1980)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
376 U.S. 187, 84 S. Ct. 638, 11 L. Ed. 2d 603, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 1784, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/persinger-v-washington-scotus-1964.