Persan v. Sun Mobile Products, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Persan v. Sun Mobile Products, Inc.

518 So. 2d 951, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 193, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 73, 1988 WL 1060

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 13, 1988

DocketNo. 87-1088

StatusPublished

This text of 518 So. 2d 951 (Persan v. Sun Mobile Products, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Persan v. Sun Mobile Products, Inc., 518 So. 2d 951, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 193, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 73, 1988 WL 1060 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s entry of a temporary injunction restraining the appellant from operating a business in competition with the appellees. We do so because the record contains some evidence that the appellant’s agreement not to compete was given in exchange for the purchase of all of appellant’s stock in a corporation purchased by appellees. See § 542.33(2), Fla. Stat. (1985). In affirming, however, we emphasize that the restraining order is temporary and is subject to the conclusions of law and findings of fact made by the trial court at trial when the parties will have a full opportunity to present their legal positions and proof, including the arguments made in this appeal.

HERSEY, C.J., and ANSTEAD and LETTS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s entry of a temporary injunction restraining the appellant from operating a business in competition with the appellees. We do so because the record contains some evidence that the appellant’s agreement not to compete was given in exchange for the purchase of all of appellant’s stock in a corporation purchased by appellees. See § 542.33(2), Fla. Stat. (1985). In affirming, however, we emphasize that the restraining order is temporary and is subject to the conclusions of law and findings of fact made by the trial court at trial when the parties will have a full opportunity to present their legal positions and proof, including the arguments made in this appeal.

HERSEY, C.J., and ANSTEAD and LETTS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

518 So. 2d 951, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 193, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 73, 1988 WL 1060, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/persan-v-sun-mobile-products-inc-fladistctapp-1988.