Perrysburg Twp. v. Rossford

785 N.E.2d 471, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1488
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 19, 2003
Docket2002-2025
StatusPublished

This text of 785 N.E.2d 471 (Perrysburg Twp. v. Rossford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Perrysburg Twp. v. Rossford, 785 N.E.2d 471, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1488 (Ohio 2003).

Opinion

Wood App. Nos. WD-02-010 and WD-02-011, 149 Ohio App.3d 645, 2002-Ohio-5498, and 2002-Ohio-6364. Discretionary appeal allowed on Proposition of Law No. I.

Lundberg Stratton, J., concurs but would also allow Proposition of Law No. II. Cooic, J., concurs but would allow all propositions of law. F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent. Resnicic, J., not participating.

Discretionary cross-appeal allowed on Proposition of Law No. I.

Moyer, C. J., and Cook, J., concur but would allow all propositions of law. F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent. Resnicic, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Perrysburg Township v. City of Rossford
778 N.E.2d 619 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
785 N.E.2d 471, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1488, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perrysburg-twp-v-rossford-ohio-2003.