Perry's Adm'r. v. Stewart
This text of 2 Del. 37 (Perry's Adm'r. v. Stewart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
said it had frequently been decided that a witness must believe in a God, and a future state of rewards and punishments. The constitution itself, in the declaration of essential rights, implies a belief in a Deity; and there can be no sanction for an oath without a belief in a future state, where secret falsehood may be punished. The court may not interfere with or control the rights of conscience, or the free exercise of religious worship, or give a preference to any religious societies, denominations or inodes of worship; but it may protect the tests of truth, by refusing to administer an oath to a man who disavows all modes of worship, denies the existence of any object of worship, or any power to punish falsehoods hereafter.
The witness was proved to have frequently asserted it to be his belief, that there was an end of us after this life, and that we perished like the brutes.
He was rejected.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 Del. 37, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perrys-admr-v-stewart-delsuperct-1835.