Perryman v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Perryman v. United States

19 Cust. Ct. 191, 1947 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1227

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJune 19, 1947

DocketNo. 7298; Entry No. DE 274

StatusPublished

This text of 19 Cust. Ct. 191 (Perryman v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Perryman v. United States, 19 Cust. Ct. 191, 1947 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1227 (cusc 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

Olives, Presiding Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the foreign value, as that value is defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Administrative Act of 1938, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise identified as item 149, consisting of so-called “Zip toilet cases,” and that such value was Sterling 6-7-6 each, less 2)4 per cent, plus packing as invoiced. As to all other merchandise involved, I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of value, and that such values were the appraised values, less additions made by the importer on entry because of an advance made by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Olives, Presiding Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the foreign value, as that value is defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Administrative Act of 1938, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise identified as item 149, consisting of so-called “Zip toilet cases,” and that such value was Sterling 6-7-6 each, less 2)4 per cent, plus packing as invoiced. As to all other merchandise involved, I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of value, and that such values were the appraised values, less additions made by the importer on entry because of an advance made by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 Cust. Ct. 191, 1947 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1227, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perryman-v-united-states-cusc-1947.