Perryman v. Curonix LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
This text of Perryman v. Curonix LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (Perryman v. Curonix LLC, a Delaware limited liability company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
LAURA TYLER PERRYMAN, § § No. 367, 2025 Defendant Below, § Appellant, § Court Below–Court of Chancery § of the State of Delaware v. § § C.A. No. 2019-1003 CURONIX LLC, a Delaware § limited liability company, § § Plaintiff Below, § Appellee. §
Submitted: October 14, 2025 Decided: October 20, 2025
Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and GRIFFITHS, Justices.
ORDER
On August 27, 2025, the appellant filed a notice of appeal from the Court of
Chancery’s bench ruling denying her motion to stay the underlying proceedings.
The Senior Court Clerk issued a notice, sent by certified mail, to the appellant
directing her to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for her failure
to comply with Supreme Court Rule 42 when taking an appeal from an apparent
interlocutory order. The appellant received the notice, as evidenced by the return
receipt filed with the Court on October 2, 2025. A timely response to the notice was
due by October 13, 2025. To date, the appellant has not responded to the notice to
show cause. Dismissal of this appeal is therefore deemed to be unopposed. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is
DISMISSED under Supreme Court Rules 3(b)(2) and 29(b).
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. Chief Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Perryman v. Curonix LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perryman-v-curonix-llc-a-delaware-limited-liability-company-del-2025.