Perry, Warden v. Blevins
This text of 915 S.E.2d 602 (Perry, Warden v. Blevins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
321 Ga. 587 FINAL COPY
S25A0089. PERRY v. BLEVINS.
PINSON, Justice.
A jury found Thomas Blevins guilty of a number of crimes in
connection with the sexual assault of B. P. Blevins appealed, and the
Court of Appeals affirmed his convictions. See Blevins v. State, 343
Ga. App. 539 (808 SE2d 740) (2017). Blevins then filed a petition for
habeas corpus in the Superior Court of Gwinnett County. The ha-
beas court granted the writ, and the warden timely appealed that
decision to this Court.
The warden raises several claims of error with respect to some
of the reasons the habeas court gave for granting relief. These claims
may well have merit. But the warden has not challenged certain
other grounds that supported the habeas court’s grant of relief.
Those grounds include the habeas court’s determinations that
Blevins’s counsel rendered constitutionally ineffective assistance by failing to investigate victims, failing to investigate juror irregulari-
ties, failing to investigate exculpatory evidence, failing to research
the law of evidence, and failing to question the State’s proof at trial.
We have made clear before that an appellant’s “failure to at-
tack alternative bases for a judgment results in the affirmance of
that judgment.” Brown v. Fokes Props. 2002, Inc., 283 Ga. 231, 233
(2) (657 SE2d 820) (2008) (cleaned up). In such an appeal, even if the
appellate court were to address the claims the appellant raised and
agree that they established error, that decision would have no effect
on an underlying judgment supported by other bases not properly
put before the court for review. Just so here. We are therefore con-
strained to affirm the judgment below. See id.
Judgment affirmed. Peterson, C. J., Warren, P. J., and LaGrua and Colvin, JJ, concur. Bethel, Ellington, and McMillian, JJ., disqualified.
2 Decided May 6, 2025 — Reconsideration denied May 28, 2025.
Habeas corpus. Gwinnett Superior Court. Before Judge Ad-
kins.
Christopher M. Carr, Attorney General, Beth A. Burton, Deputy
Attorney General, Meghan H. Hill, Michael A. Oldham, Senior As-
sistant Attorneys General, for appellant.
Peters Rubin Sheffield & Hodges, Jason B. Sheffield, Linda S.
Sheffield; Christine A. Koehler, for appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
915 S.E.2d 602, 321 Ga. 587, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perry-warden-v-blevins-ga-2025.