Perry v. Williams

Ohio Supreme Court

Perry v. Williams

985 N.E.2d 514, 135 Ohio St. 3d 1403

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 4, 2013·No. 2013-0460·Published

Opinion

Hamilton App. No. C-120120. This cause is pending before the court as a jurisdictional appeal. The records of this court indicate that appellant has not filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction, due March 25, 2013, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence.

Upon consideration thereof, it is ordered by the court that this cause is dismissed.

It is further ordered that appellant’s motion for stay of the court of appeals’ judgment is denied as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hamilton App. No. C-120120. This cause is pending before the court as a jurisdictional appeal. The records of this court indicate that appellant has not filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction, due March 25, 2013, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence.

Upon consideration thereof, it is ordered by the court that this cause is dismissed.

It is further ordered that appellant’s motion for stay of the court of appeals’ judgment is denied as moot.

Perry v. Williams, 985 N.E.2d 514, 135 Ohio St. 3d 1403 (Ohio 2013).

Pincite

985 N.E.2d 514 (Perry v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.