Perry v. Williams

Ohio Supreme Court

Perry v. Williams

985 N.E.2d 514, 135 Ohio St. 3d 1403

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 4, 2013

Docket2013-0460

StatusPublished

This text of 985 N.E.2d 514 (Perry v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Perry v. Williams, 985 N.E.2d 514, 135 Ohio St. 3d 1403 (Ohio 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

Hamilton App. No. C-120120. This cause is pending before the court as a jurisdictional appeal. The records of this court indicate that appellant has not filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction, due March 25, 2013, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence.

Upon consideration thereof, it is ordered by the court that this cause is dismissed.

It is further ordered that appellant’s motion for stay of the court of appeals’ judgment is denied as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hamilton App. No. C-120120. This cause is pending before the court as a jurisdictional appeal. The records of this court indicate that appellant has not filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction, due March 25, 2013, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence.

Upon consideration thereof, it is ordered by the court that this cause is dismissed.

It is further ordered that appellant’s motion for stay of the court of appeals’ judgment is denied as moot.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

985 N.E.2d 514, 135 Ohio St. 3d 1403, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perry-v-williams-ohio-2013.