Perry v. White
846 So. 2d 797, 2002 La.App. 3 Cir. 0858, 2003 La. App. LEXIS 297, 2003 WL 292080
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedFebruary 12, 2003
DocketNo. 02-858
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 846 So. 2d 797 (Perry v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Perry v. White, 846 So. 2d 797, 2002 La.App. 3 Cir. 0858, 2003 La. App. LEXIS 297, 2003 WL 292080 (La. Ct. App. 2003).
Opinion
For the reasons expressed in Caffery v. White, 02-857 (La.App. 3 Cir. 2/12/03); 846 So.2d 771, the judgment of the trial court in favor of Heidi Perry and against Matthew White and Luhr Brothers, Inc. is affirmed. Costs of this appeal are assessed to Defendants Appellants, Matthew White and Luhr Brothers, Inc.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Caffery v. White
846 So. 2d 771 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2003)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
846 So. 2d 797, 2002 La.App. 3 Cir. 0858, 2003 La. App. LEXIS 297, 2003 WL 292080, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perry-v-white-lactapp-2003.