Perry v. White
846 So. 2d 797, 2002 La.App. 3 Cir. 0858, 2003 La. App. LEXIS 297, 2003 WL 292080
Opinion
For the reasons expressed in Caffery v. White, 02-857 (La.App. 3 Cir. 2/12/03); 846 So.2d 771, the judgment of the trial court in favor of Heidi Perry and against Matthew White and Luhr Brothers, Inc. is affirmed. Costs of this appeal are assessed to Defendants Appellants, Matthew White and Luhr Brothers, Inc.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Perry v. White, 846 So. 2d 797, 2002 La.App. 3 Cir. 0858, 2003 La. App. LEXIS 297, 2003 WL 292080 (La. Ct. App. 2003).
846 So. 2d 797 (Perry v. White) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Caffery v. White
846 So. 2d 771 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2003)