Perry v. Waters

1953 OK CR 62, 256 P.2d 1119, 97 Okla. Crim. 17, 1953 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 211
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedApril 29, 1953
DocketA-11908
StatusPublished
Cited by18 cases

This text of 1953 OK CR 62 (Perry v. Waters) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Perry v. Waters, 1953 OK CR 62, 256 P.2d 1119, 97 Okla. Crim. 17, 1953 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 211 (Okla. Ct. App. 1953).

Opinion

*18 JONES, J.

This is an original action in habeas corpus instituted by the petitioner, Clarence Perry, for the purpose of securing his release from confinement in the penitentiary.

The verified petition alleges that petitioner is restrained by reason of a commitment issued by virtue of a judgment and sentence pronounced by the district court of Tillman county in case No. 1821 in said county, wherein the petitioner was sentenced to serve a term' of 10 years imprisonment in the penitentiary upon a plea of guilty to the crime of manslaughter on January 5, 1953.

The Attorney General has filed a demurrer to the petition. The petition was evidently prepared by an inmate of the penitentiary and is very poorly worded. It is difficult for us to understand just exactly the complaint which the petitioner is making but apparently his principal complaint is that the judgment and sentence was excessive under the facts. This is a question that may not be inquired into on habeas corpus, but is a question which may be considered on an appeal from a conviction.

On habeas corpus this court limits its inquiry to matters which are jurisdictional in their nature and will not lie to correct errors of law occurring at a trial. Since the pettion alleges that the judgment and sentence was rendered on January 5, 1953, the petitioner has six months from that date in which to complete his appeal to this court from said judgment. 22 O.S. 1951 § 1054. On an appeal the matters about which complaint is made could be presented and determined by this court.

The petition is denied.

POWELL, P. J., and BRETT, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. State
1964 OK CR 51 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1964)
Miller v. State
1964 OK CR 32 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1964)
Pleasant v. State
1964 OK CR 30 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1964)
Sutton v. Raines
1962 OK CR 47 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1962)
Cox v. Raines
1962 OK CR 13 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1962)
Weeden v. Raines
1961 OK CR 104 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1961)
Hill v. Raines
1961 OK CR 84 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1961)
In re Whiteaker
1961 OK CR 78 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1961)
Morgan v. Raines
1961 OK CR 36 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1961)
Freeman v. Raines
1960 OK CR 50 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1960)
In re Jones
1960 OK CR 13 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1960)
Shane v. McLeod
1959 OK CR 21 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1959)
Application of Davis
1959 OK CR 1 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1959)
In re the Habeas Corpus of Simmons
1957 OK CR 97 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1957)
Hurt v. State
1957 OK CR 55 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1957)
Habeas Corpus of Bolton v. McLeod
1956 OK CR 22 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1956)
Application of Riddle
1956 OK CR 7 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1953 OK CR 62, 256 P.2d 1119, 97 Okla. Crim. 17, 1953 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perry-v-waters-oklacrimapp-1953.