Perry v. Vega

Opinion

‘USDC SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED □ SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK | DOC #: os □ wenn ene K DATE FILED: 4/4/2025 __ bL_—_——_————— KAHREEN S. PERRY, Plaintiff, 22-CV-05813 (JHR)(SN) -against- ORDER OF SERVICE STEVEN VEGA, et al., Defendants. panne eX

SARAH NETBURN, United States Magistrate Judge: Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a Third Amended Complaint adding Christian Molina and David Robles as defendants. ECF No. 65-1. Because Plaintiff has been granted permission to proceed in forma pauperis, he is entitled to rely on the Court to effectuate service. Walker v. Schult, 717 F.3d. 119, n.6 (2d Cir. 2013); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (“The officers of the court shall issue and serve all process . . . in [IFP] cases.”). To allow Plaintiff to effectuate service on Defendant Christian Molina, the Clerk of Court is directed to electronically notify the New York City Police Department and the New York City Law Department of this order. Plaintiff identifies Defendant Christian Molina as being employed at Police Service Area 4, 130 Avenue C, New York, NY 10009. The Court requests that Defendant Christian Molina waive service of summons. SO ORDERED.

SARAH NETBURN | United States Magistrate Judge DATED: April 4, 2025 New York, New York