Perry v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Perry v. United States

28 Cust. Ct. 429, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 331

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedMarch 25, 1952

DocketNo. 56491; protests 889492-G and 952748-G (Seattle)

StatusPublished

This text of 28 Cust. Ct. 429 (Perry v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Perry v. United States, 28 Cust. Ct. 429, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 331 (cusc 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of so-called “artificial gut or artificial tegusu,” in chief value of silk, the same in all material respects as the merchandise the classification of which was involved in Geo. S. Bush & Co., Inc. v. United States (34 C. C. P. A. 17, C. A. D. 338), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of so-called “artificial gut or artificial tegusu,” in chief value of silk, the same in all material respects as the merchandise the classification of which was involved in Geo. S. Bush & Co., Inc. v. United States (34 C. C. P. A. 17, C. A. D. 338), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

28 Cust. Ct. 429, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perry-v-united-states-cusc-1952.