Perry v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Perry v. United States

669 F. App'x 113

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedOctober 3, 2016

DocketNo. 16-1129

StatusPublished

This text of 669 F. App'x 113 (Perry v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Perry v. United States, 669 F. App'x 113 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Anthony W. Perry appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Perry v. United States, No. 8:14-cv-02862-TDC (D. Md. June 3, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented, in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Anthony W. Perry appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Perry v. United States, No. 8:14-cv-02862-TDC (D. Md. June 3, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented, in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

669 F. App'x 113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perry-v-united-states-ca4-2016.