Perry v. United States

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 8, 2011
Docket10-7468
StatusUnpublished

This text of Perry v. United States (Perry v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Perry v. United States, (4th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7468

CALVIN PERRY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (7:10-cv-00447-jct-mfu)

Submitted: February 28, 2011 Decided: March 8, 2011

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Calvin Perry, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Calvin Perry appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his petition for a writ of mandamus. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Perry

v. United States, No. 7:10-cv-00447-jct-mfu (W.D. Va. Oct. 8,

2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process The petition for a writ of mandamus is denied.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Perry v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perry-v-united-states-ca4-2011.