Perry v. . Tupper

71 N.C. 387
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided June 5, 1874·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Reade, J.

This is a branch of a case between the same parties at this term. In that case the Judge granted an injunction and the defendant appealed. In this case the plaintiff appealed from the refusal of the Judge to grant a restraining order at an earlier stage of the case.

We think his Honor was right in x'efusing the restraining oi’der. Our reasons for this opinion will be found in the other bi’anch of the case at this term.

Where a party has been put out of possession of land by an abuse of the process of the law, there must be restitution as a matter of course, unless some new matter has intervened in the meantime.

There is no error. Let this be certified.

Pee Cubiam. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Perry v. . Tupper, 71 N.C. 387 (N.C. 1874).

71 N.C. 387 (Perry v. . Tupper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Robinson Ex Rel. McDowell v. McDowell
34 S.E. 550 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1899)
Lytle v. . Lytle
94 N.C. 522 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1886)