Perry v. Stowe

111 Mass. 60
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1872
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 111 Mass. 60 (Perry v. Stowe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Perry v. Stowe, 111 Mass. 60 (Mass. 1872).

Opinion

A .MES, J.

The Franklin Engine Company of Bradford was a part of the organized fire department of that town. The members were enginemen appointed by the engineers and paid by the [63]*63town. Their duties and powers were such as the general laws attach to the office of enginemen, and no others. The fact that they were allowed to “ vote in members ” does not convert the company into a mere association of volunteers. No vote which they could pass upon this subject amounted to anything more than a nomination of the persons whom they wished the engineers to appoint. It was not binding upon the engineers, and the persons voted for by the company did not become members by virtue of that vote, but solely by the appointment of the engineers. The fact that they were allowed some of the privileges and indulgencies of a social club had no effect to alter the legal character of the company, or to give to its members any different rights, or tenure of office, from that of enginemen generally.

We therefore agree with the award of the auditor that the furniture replevied was the property of the engine company, and not of the individual members for the time being; that their duty was to transmit it to their successors as little impaired by use as conveniently practicable ; and that the vote to sell it to the defendant was unauthorized and void. There can be no doubt under the Gen. Sts. c. 24, §§ 9, 17, 26, of the power of the engineers to remove enginemen at their pleasure; and the plaintiffs, as the only remaining members, had, at the date of the writ, the right of immediate possession, and are the proper parties to bring this action. Judgment on the verdict.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bowers v. Selectmen of Needham
103 N.E. 906 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1914)
Inhabitants of Brookline v. Sherman
1 N.E. 153 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1885)
Bisbee v. Fadden
1 N.E. 742 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1885)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
111 Mass. 60, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perry-v-stowe-mass-1872.