Perry v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Perry v. State

200 S.W.3d 40, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 495, 2006 WL 997870

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 18, 2006

DocketED 86450

StatusPublished

This text of 200 S.W.3d 40 (Perry v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Perry v. State, 200 S.W.3d 40, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 495, 2006 WL 997870 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Tremonti Perry, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a *41 memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Tremonti Perry, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a *41 memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

200 S.W.3d 40, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 495, 2006 WL 997870, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perry-v-state-moctapp-2006.