Perry v. State

114 S.E. 917, 29 Ga. App. 310, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 266
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 13, 1922
Docket13972
StatusPublished

This text of 114 S.E. 917 (Perry v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Perry v. State, 114 S.E. 917, 29 Ga. App. 310, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 266 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The evidence, while circumstantial, was sufficient too exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of the defendant’s guilt, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Luhe and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. Lewis & Tyler, for plaintiff in error. J. F. Hatchett, solicitor, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
114 S.E. 917, 29 Ga. App. 310, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 266, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perry-v-state-gactapp-1922.