Perry v. State
This text of 91 S.E. 939 (Perry v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. “The right of formal arraignment and plea will be conclusively considered as waived, where the defendant goes to trial before the jury, on the merits, and fails, until after verdict, to bring to the attention of the court that he has not been formally called upon to enter a plea to the indictment.” Brown v. State, ante, 619, and cases cited.
2. The evidence in this case, while circumstantial, was sufficient to authorize the conviction of the accused of the offense of hog stealing. The exceptions taken to the charge of the court, so far as approved by the trial court, are without merit, and the verdict, approved by the trial judge, will not be disturbed by this court. Landrum v. Landrum, 145 Ga. 307 (89 S. E. 201).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
91 S.E. 939, 19 Ga. App. 619, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 263, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perry-v-state-gactapp-1917.