Perry v. State

58 S.E. 60, 1 Ga. App. 542, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 34
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 28, 1907·No. 366·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

1. On the trial of a defendant for violating the act of August 7, 1903 (Acts 1903, p. 91), by specific acts set forth in the indictment, the judge did not err in giving the whole of said act in his charge to the jury, although the general words with which the act concludes, and which were intended to embrace all other violations of it, did not apply to the case on trial. Especially is this true when it was not contended that the defendant was guilty except in the manner charged in the indictment.

2. No error of law was committed, and' the verdict was fully warranted by the evidence.

Judgment affirmed. Powell, J., disqualified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Perry v. State, 58 S.E. 60, 1 Ga. App. 542, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 34 (Ga. Ct. App. 1907).

58 S.E. 60 (Perry v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Roberts v. Stennett
410 S.E.2d 356 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1991)
Long v. Marion
355 S.E.2d 711 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1987)
Spivey v. State
143 S.E. 450 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)
Pittman v. State
95 S.E. 940 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)