Perry v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Perry v. State

114 So. 3d 309, 2013 WL 1890631, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 7362

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Perry v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 3888 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 8, 2013·No. No. 4D11-3557·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals his convictions for kidnapping and armed sexual battery and his sentence to life in prison. He alleges that the trial court reversibly erred by (1) assisting the prosecutor in admitting evidence, (2) denying appellant’s motion for judgment of acquittal for kidnapping, and (3) allowing a DNA expert to bolster his own testimony. We find these issues to be without merit, and as such, we affirm.

Affirmed.

WARNER, GROSS and LEVINE, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals his convictions for kidnapping and armed sexual battery and his sentence to life in prison. He alleges that the trial court reversibly erred by (1) assisting the prosecutor in admitting evidence, (2) denying appellant’s motion for judgment of acquittal for kidnapping, and (3) allowing a DNA expert to bolster his own testimony. We find these issues to be without merit, and as such, we affirm.

Affirmed.

WARNER, GROSS and LEVINE, JJ„ concur.

Perry v. State, 114 So. 3d 309, 2013 WL 1890631, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 7362 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

114 So. 3d 309 (Perry v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.