Perry v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Perry v. State

114 So. 3d 309, 2013 WL 1890631, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 7362

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 8, 2013

DocketNo. 4D11-3557

StatusPublished

This text of 114 So. 3d 309 (Perry v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Perry v. State, 114 So. 3d 309, 2013 WL 1890631, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 7362 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals his convictions for kidnapping and armed sexual battery and his sentence to life in prison. He alleges that the trial court reversibly erred by (1) assisting the prosecutor in admitting evidence, (2) denying appellant’s motion for judgment of acquittal for kidnapping, and (3) allowing a DNA expert to bolster his own testimony. We find these issues to be without merit, and as such, we affirm.

Affirmed.

WARNER, GROSS and LEVINE, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals his convictions for kidnapping and armed sexual battery and his sentence to life in prison. He alleges that the trial court reversibly erred by (1) assisting the prosecutor in admitting evidence, (2) denying appellant’s motion for judgment of acquittal for kidnapping, and (3) allowing a DNA expert to bolster his own testimony. We find these issues to be without merit, and as such, we affirm.

Affirmed.

WARNER, GROSS and LEVINE, JJ„ concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

114 So. 3d 309, 2013 WL 1890631, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 7362, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perry-v-state-fladistctapp-2013.