Perry v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Perry v. State

955 So. 2d 1214, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 7108, 2007 WL 1342538

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 9, 2007

DocketNo. 4D06-1785

StatusPublished

This text of 955 So. 2d 1214 (Perry v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Perry v. State, 955 So. 2d 1214, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 7108, 2007 WL 1342538 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s postconviction relief claim that prior to entering Ms plea, his counsel misadvised him as to the length of a potential sentence, is conclusively refuted by the thorough and detailed plea conference conducted by the trial court. See Scheele v. State, 953 So.2d 782 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007), reh’g granted No. 4D06-38 (Fla. 4th DCA May 9, 2007) (observing that “[w]hat is said and done at a plea conference carries consequences”).

Affirmed.

STONE, GROSS and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s postconviction relief claim that prior to entering Ms plea, his counsel misadvised him as to the length of a potential sentence, is conclusively refuted by the thorough and detailed plea conference conducted by the trial court. See Scheele v. State, 953 So.2d 782 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007), reh’g granted No. 4D06-38 (Fla. 4th DCA May 9, 2007) (observing that “[w]hat is said and done at a plea conference carries consequences”).

Affirmed.

STONE, GROSS and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

955 So. 2d 1214, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 7108, 2007 WL 1342538, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perry-v-state-fladistctapp-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack