Perry v. State
824 So. 2d 255, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 11269, 2002 WL 1798909
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Perry v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 787 So. 2d 67 →
Opinion
Affirmed without prejudice to seek review in a legally sufficient, timely motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Moore v. State, 810 So.2d 976 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002) (citing Hollis v. State, 763 So.2d 1155 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)) (explaining that a claim that the state did not give the defendant notice of its intent to seek a habitual offender sentence is not renewable under rule 3.800(a)).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Perry v. State, 824 So. 2d 255, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 11269, 2002 WL 1798909 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
824 So. 2d 255 (Perry v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Moore v. State
810 So. 2d 976 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Hollis v. State
763 So. 2d 1155 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)