Perry v. State

586 So. 2d 256, 1991 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1205, 1991 WL 180423
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Perry v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 568 So. 2d 339
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama·Decided July 26, 1991·No. 8 Div. 301·Published

Opinion

AFTER REMAND FROM ALABAMA SUPREME COURT

McMILLAN, Judge.

Pursuant to the Alabama Supreme Court’s decision in Perry v. State, 586 So.2d 242 (Ala.1991), this cause is remanded to the trial court with instructions to conduct an evidentiary hearing to determine the admissibility of both the DNA “matching” evidence and the DNA population frequency statistical evidence. As ordered by the Alabama Supreme Court, if the trial court determines that either the “matching” evidence or the population frequency statistical evidence is inadmissible, the testimony was improperly admitted and the trial court should grant the appellant a new trial. However, if the trial court determines that the evidence is admissible and was otherwise proper, then it should enter and order modifying, or leaving undisturbed, its judgment of conviction.

REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

All Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Perry v. State, 586 So. 2d 256, 1991 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1205, 1991 WL 180423 (Ala. Ct. App. 1991).

586 So. 2d 256 (Perry v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ex Parte Perry
586 So. 2d 242 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1991)