Perry v. Sloan (Slip Opinion)

2017 Ohio 1404, 77 N.E.3d 942, 149 Ohio St. 3d 690
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedApril 18, 2017
Docket2016-0750
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 2017 Ohio 1404 (Perry v. Sloan (Slip Opinion)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Perry v. Sloan (Slip Opinion), 2017 Ohio 1404, 77 N.E.3d 942, 149 Ohio St. 3d 690 (Ohio 2017).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the Eleventh District Court of Appeals dismissing the petition of appellant, Ronnie Perry, for a writ of habeas corpus.

{¶ 2} In 2013, Perry was convicted in the Richland County Court of Common Pleas of drug offenses in two separate cases. He was sentenced to a total of nine years in prison. Perry contends that the jury-verdict forms in both cases were insufficient to support his convictions and that the most he could have been sentenced to was either one or two years. Because he has served more than three years, Perry contends that he is entitled to immediate release. The court of appeals granted the motion of appellee, Warden Brigham Sloan, to dismiss the petition.

{¶ 3} Habeas corpus is not available to challenge the validity of verdict forms. Wells v. Hudson, 113 Ohio St.3d 308, 2007-Ohio-1955, 865 N.E.2d 46, ¶ 8. Perry’s “claims of erroneous * * * verdict forms could have been raised in his direct appeal from his criminal convictions and sentences.” Smith v. Mitchell, 80 Ohio St.3d 624, 625, 687 N.E.2d 749 (1998). Therefore, Perry had an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law and is not entitled to a writ of habeas corpus. Id.

{¶ 4} Perry claims that he does not have an adequate remedy, because his appellate attorney failed to raise a challenge to the verdict forms on direct appeal. However, Perry could have filed an application to reopen his appeal under App.R. 26(B) based on ineffective assistance of counsel. The availability of adequate remedies at law, even if those remedies were not sought or were unsuccessful, precludes a writ of habeas corpus. State ex rel. O’Neal v. Bunting, 140 Ohio St.3d 339, 2014-Ohio-4037, 18 N.E.3d 430, ¶ 14-15.

Judgment affirmed.

O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Kennedy, French, O’Neill, Fischer, and DeWine, JJ., concur. *691 Ronnie Perry, pro se. Michael DeWine, Attorney General, and Jerri L. Fosnaught, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Tenney
2024 Ohio 5268 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2024)
Appenzeller v. Black
2024 Ohio 240 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2024)
Pope v. Bracy
2022 Ohio 3190 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2022)
State ex rel. Person v. McCarty (Slip Opinion)
2021 Ohio 1207 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2021)
State ex rel. Russell v. Klatt (Slip Opinion)
2020 Ohio 875 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2020)
State v. Perry
2018 Ohio 4395 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2018)
Dean v. Marquis
2018 Ohio 1801 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2018)
Perry v. Sloan
2017 Ohio 4396 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2017 Ohio 1404, 77 N.E.3d 942, 149 Ohio St. 3d 690, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perry-v-sloan-slip-opinion-ohio-2017.