Perry v. Scott

7 S.W. 384, 68 Tex. 208, 1887 Tex. LEXIS 665
Texas Supreme Court·Decided April 26, 1887·No. No. 6115·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Willie Chief Justice.

This is a motion to affirm a certificate. The record shows notice of appeal, and an attempt to perfect it by filing an affidavit of poverty in lieu of an appeal bond. The oath seems to be in compliance with the statute in every respect except as to a description of the judgment appealed from. It does not give the number of the case, the date of the judgment, nor does it state the nature of the judgment, nor in whose favor it was rendered. In Holmes v. McIntyre, 61 Texas, 9, we held that it was necessary that an affidavit of poverty should identify the judgment appealed from with the same certainty as is required in case of an appeal bond. Were no better description of the judgment than this contained in an appeal bond, the cause would of course be dismissed. This appeal not having been perfected by a proper affidavit, the certificate must be dismissed, and it is so ordered.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Perry v. Scott, 7 S.W. 384, 68 Tex. 208, 1887 Tex. LEXIS 665 (Tex. 1887).

7 S.W. 384 (Perry v. Scott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Titan Oil & Gas, Inc. v. Shipley
517 S.W.2d 210 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1975)
Tutein v. Daniels
10 V.I. 255 (Virgin Islands, 1973)
Leggett v. Norman
6 So. 2d 578 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1942)
Davis v. National Bond & Mortgage Corp.
45 S.W.2d 272 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1931)
Thompson v. Logan
51 So. 985 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1909)
Wesley v. Kuteman
62 S.W. 1074 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1901)
Ward v. Cochran
71 F. 127 (Eighth Circuit, 1895)