Perry v. Rollins

New York Supreme Court

Perry v. Rollins

56 How. Pr. 242

New York Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1878·Published

Opinion

The account is sufficiently established by the bill of particulars (Place agt. Cheeseborough, 4 Hun, 577). The bill of particulars contains upwards of sixty items involving labor on at least sixty different days, making a “long account” within, the judicial definition and meaning of that expression ( Continental Bank Note Co. agt. The Industrial Exhibition Co., 1 Hun, 118).

Present, Davis, P. J., Beady and Ingalls, JJ.

Order of reference affirmed; no opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The account is sufficiently established by the bill of particulars (Place agt. Cheeseborough, 4 Hun, 577). The bill of particulars contains upwards of sixty items involving labor on at least sixty different days, making a “long account” within, the judicial definition and meaning of that expression ( Continental Bank Note Co. agt. The Industrial Exhibition Co., 1 Hun, 118).

Present, Davis, P. J., Beady and Ingalls, JJ.

Order of reference affirmed; no opinion.

Perry v. Rollins, 56 How. Pr. 242 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1878).

Pincite

56 How. Pr. 242 (Perry v. Rollins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.