Perry v. Phelps
This text of 957 A.2d 2 (Perry v. Phelps) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
BROOKS PERRY, Plaintiff Below, Appellant,
v.
WARDEN PHELPS, Defendant Below, Appellee.
Supreme Court of Delaware.
ORDER
Henry duPont Ridgely, Justice.
This 29th day of August 2008, in this pro se appeal from the denial of habeas corpus relief, it appears to the Court that the appellant, Brooks Perry, has not filed the opening brief and appendix that were due to be filed on or before July 28, 2008. Moreover, Perry has not responded to the Clerk's brief delinquency letter dated July 30, 2008, and he has not responded to the Clerk's notice to show cause dated August 8, 2008. Perry's failure to respond to the Clerk's notice to show cause is deemed to be his consent to the dismissal of this appeal.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Supreme Court Rules 3(b)(2) and 29(b) that the appeal is DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
957 A.2d 2, 2008 WL 4001848, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perry-v-phelps-del-2008.