Perry v. Perry

88 A.D.3d 861, 931 N.Y.2d 516
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 18, 2011·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

An award of counsel fees pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 237 (a) is entrusted to the sound discretion of the trial court (see DeCabrera v Cabrera-Rosete, 70 NY2d 879, 881 [1987]). In determining whether to award such a fee, the court should “review the financial circumstances of both parties together with all the other circumstances of the case, which may include the relative merit of the parties’ positions” (id. at 881). Here, the trial court providently exercised its discretion in denying the plaintiffs motion for an award of an attorney’s fee. Skelos, J.E, Balkin, Leventhal and Hall, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Perry v. Perry, 88 A.D.3d 861, 931 N.Y.2d 516 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

88 A.D.3d 861 (Perry v. Perry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Papakonstantis v. Papakonstantis
2018 NY Slip Op 5326 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Bagielto v. Kolsch
2017 NY Slip Op 1666 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Vitale v. Vitale
112 A.D.3d 614 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)