Perry v. Perry
298 So. 2d 439
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 9, 1974·No. No. 73-1078·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
No error or abuse of discretion has been demonstrated.
We affirm. Pierson v. Sharp, 283 So.2d 880 (4th D.C.A.Fla.1973); Blacharski v. Watts, 268 So.2d 465 (4th D.C.A.Fla.1972); Rosenstein v. Raticoff, 265 So.2d 387 (4th D.C.A.Fla.1972); Castaldo v. Singapore J. F. Inc., 258 So.2d 499 (3d D.C.A.Fla.1972); Latin American Benefit Center, Inc. v. Johnstoneaux, 257 So.2d 86 (3d D.C.A.Fla.1972); Sun Plastics, Inc. v. Internat’l Identifiers, Inc., 213 So.2d 258 (3d D.C.A.Fla.1968); Phillips v. Blum, 139 So.2d 459 (3d D.C.A.Fla.1962).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Perry v. Perry, 298 So. 2d 439 (Fla. Ct. App. 1974).
298 So. 2d 439 (Perry v. Perry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Town of Palm Beach v. Royal Palm Beach Hotel, Inc.
298 So. 2d 439 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)