Perry v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'n

58 N.Y.S. 844, 41 A.D. 626

This text of 58 N.Y.S. 844 (Perry v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Perry v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'n, 58 N.Y.S. 844, 41 A.D. 626 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1899).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

It may be that, if we felt at liberty to treat the question as an open one, we would concur in the opinion of our [845]*845Brother WOODWARD; but, in our view, the present action is substantially the same in character as that of Swan v. Association, 155 N. Y. 9, 49 N. E. 258, and the decision in this case must follow that authority.

If the law in the Swan Case is to be retracted, it must be retracted by the court bf appeals, and not by us.

The judgment appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Parker
131 U.S. 221 (Supreme Court, 1889)
Swan v. . Mutual Reserve Fund Life Assn.
49 N.E. 258 (New York Court of Appeals, 1898)
People v. . Lowe
22 N.E. 1016 (New York Court of Appeals, 1889)
Roberts v. . New York Elevated R.R. Co.
49 N.E. 262 (New York Court of Appeals, 1898)
Sage v. . Culver
41 N.E. 513 (New York Court of Appeals, 1895)
Gray v. City of Brooklyn
50 Barb. 365 (New York Supreme Court, 1868)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
58 N.Y.S. 844, 41 A.D. 626, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perry-v-mutual-reserve-fund-life-assn-nyappdiv-1899.